|
Washington state voters passed a landmark campaign finance law in 1992. More
than 72 percent of voters said "yes" to Initiative 134 which, among
other campaign reform limits, provided a requirement that before payroll deductions
for politics were taken, annual, written permission had to be obtained from
the employee.
When first faced with Initiative 134, labor organizations turned their disapproval
toward producing a counter-initiative which guaranteed protection for the sacred
cow of unions' political clout-mandatory political assessments. When the union-favored
proposal failed to garner enough signatures to make the November 1992 ballot,
unions invested money and time to defeat Initiative 134. The total amount of
union anti-134 spending is unknown, but expenditures of $158,000 were reported
to campaign officials. Of the reported $158,000, the Washington Education Association
donated $85,250, including a single contribution of $50,000 from the National
Education Association. See Contribution List below for a list of teacher
union donations.
Despite well-funded opposition, Initiative 134 passed with tremendous popular
support. Upon passage, the WEA formed a committee called "Life After I-134
Task Force." Minutes from the meetings of this task force reveal the WEA's
emphasis on the need for collection of political monies.
Documentation
| 11/4/92 |
Statewide
Ballot Contribution List |
Contributions to anti-134 group list WEA and local union as
major contributors |
| 2/17/93 |
"Life
after I-134" Minutes |
Task force discusses strategies to replace political deductions, including
an assessment for "community education." |
| 4/20/93 |
"Life
after I-134" Minutes |
Task force discusses legal action; advised by general counsel to "proceed
with litigation" to maintain status quo while litigation is ongoing.
|
| 5/21/93 |
"Life
after I-134" Minutes |
Task force recommendations: "we will have to find a new way to collect
political action/education money by September of 1994." |
|